RE: GoLive vs. Dreamweaver

Subject: RE: GoLive vs. Dreamweaver
From: "Rick Bishop" <bishopr -at- jcdc -dot- jobcorps -dot- org>
To: <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 11:25:55 -0600

Just returned from a Macromedia Presentation in Austin. They claim that 80% of all professional web authors own Dreamweaver.

>>> Sean Hower <hokumhome -at- freehomepage -dot- com> 02/18/04 10:36AM >>>

kevin wrote:
"Of course, nobody uses the built-in WYSIWYG editor in
RoboHelp. Everybody uses DreamWeaver or some other
powerful HTML publishing tool instead."

But nobody has seen fit to lay out a point-by-point
comparison of the advantages and disadvantages.
That's an absolute statement, and absolute statements should be ignored absolutely. Or, if you prefer my weaker hypothesis, be wary of absolute statements. As someone else pointed out, don't know who/when, even if you author pages in DW, the moment you open and save them in RH, they've got the RH code, so there's really no point in using DW first, except, maybe, if someone is more familiar with DW, is more familiar with creating Web sites (as opposed to Web-Help), or just doesn't like RH. I would assume that the lack of point-by-point comparisons indicates that people are going on preference and not any real benefit of using one over the other.

Is DreamWeaver or GoLive (or any of the others) capable
of selectively creating/publishing output based on
conditional settings?
For DW, the answer is no (as far as I can tell). You can, of course, do this with JavaScript that you've coded yourself. But as far as it being a "feature" of DW like it is in RH, I don't think so. You can, of course, create dynamic content from a database, but I don't think that's what you're talking about.

You have to understand that RH and DW are different tools with different purposes. RH is a help authoring tool. DW is a Web site authoring tool. Their features are geared towards those purposes. You could, of course, use RH to create a Web site, or use DW to create WebHelp, but you would have to do extra work to do it. But that extra work might be worth it depending on your work environment. I think i've said this before, but we switched from RH to DW because we are starting to use XML and we're changing how we're generating our help. In this scenario, DW made sense while RH didn't.

Would I use DW to create you're run-of-the-mill WebHelp? Nope. I'd use RH. Would I use RH to create you're run-of-the-mill Web site? Nope. I'd use DW. Now, I have been toying with the idea of "reimagining" my Web site as Web help generated with RH, but I haven't tried it yet. :-)

Previous by Author: RE: GoLive vs. Dreamweaver
Next by Author: RE: Make pixel shim invisible
Previous by Thread: RE: GoLive vs. Dreamweaver
Next by Thread: Re: GoLive vs. DreamWeaver

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads