RE: RoboHelp for FrameMaker

Subject: RE: RoboHelp for FrameMaker
From: Brian Jennings <BrianJennings -at- cougarmtn -dot- com>
To: "'T. Word Smith'" <techwordsmith -at- yahoo -dot- com>, TECHWR-L <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 12:56:16 -0700

"and it's 2-3 times
slower than WWP 2003."

I'm not sure what version you tested, but I do know they made some changes
that have really improved the time issue. Whether or not it's still that
much slower than WWP I don't know. Also, from my limited knowledge of WWP, I
think it doesn't have the output flexibility of RH 4 FM. In other words, I
could output the same project to two .chms and have different conditional
text show in each one (along with other options). Or I could output the same
help to .chm and also to webhelp. Remember, I can set this all up and so I
can get these output without making any changes to the project, just compile
the output and off I go. I don't think WWP does this. I could be wrong. With
that said, I agree that the products are very similar and a decision between
the two products is largely subjective.



Previous by Author: RE: RoboHelp for FrameMaker
Next by Author: RE: RoboHelp for FrameMaker
Previous by Thread: Re: RoboHelp for FrameMaker
Next by Thread: RE: RoboHelp for FrameMaker

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads