RE: "DO NOT COOK"?

Subject: RE: "DO NOT COOK"?
From: "John Posada" <JPosada -at- isogon -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 12:10:15 -0500


>assumption that my wife did. Whenever possible,
>I try to anticipate things people might be gonna
>do that they aren't supposed to and include the
>appropriate warning. Do you all think it was
>called for in this case?

Do we discuss this from the perspective of it being you and your wife
who did it, or do we discuss it from the perspective of consumer in
general?

:-)

John Posada
Senior Technical Writer
Isogon Corporation
http://www.isogon.com


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

ROBOHELP FOR FRAMEMAKER AS LOW AS $299! Offer expires March 31.
Publish your FrameMaker documents online -- quickly and easily!

New licenses are only $899 for one and $499 for additional licenses.
Use a competitor's product? Switch to RoboHelp for FrameMaker
for only $299! Buy today: CALL 1-800-462-4420 or 1 858-847-7900.
Hurry, offer expires March 31 2004.


---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Previous by Author: RE: Future Tense Controversy
Next by Author: RE: "DO NOT COOK"?
Previous by Thread: Re: "DO NOT COOK"?
Next by Thread: RE: "DO NOT COOK"?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads