RE: Why WYSIWYG for XML???

Subject: RE: Why WYSIWYG for XML???
From: Chris Gooch <chris -dot- gooch -at- lightworkdesign -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 10:59:50 +0100




Bill Lawrence wrote:

+++
I note (with no small amount of consternation) that many writers, when
considering going to XML, are looking for WYSIWYG authoring tools. In
my experience, using WYSIWYG tools are a real barrier to getting writers
into the mindset of semantic markup versus visual layout.
+++



Too right Bill --- time to share this polemic
again:

http://ricardo.ecn.wfu.edu/~cottrell/wp.html


Chris.


Christopher Gooch, Technical Author
LightWork Design, Sheffield, UK.
www.lightworkdesign.com



^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

SEE THE ALL NEW ROBOHELP X5 IN ACTION: RoboHelp X5 is a giant leap forward
in Help authoring technology, featuring Word 2003 support, Content
Management, Multi-Author support, PDF and XML support and much more! http://www.macromedia.com/go/techwrldemo

>From a single set of Word documents, create online Help and printed
documentation with ComponentOne Doc-To-Help 7 Professional, a new yearly
subscription service offering free updates and upgrades, support, and more.
http://www.doctohelp.com

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Previous by Author: Re: Problems with developing a plugin
Next by Author: RE: Why WYSIWYG for XML???
Previous by Thread: RE: Why WYSIWYG for XML???
Next by Thread: RE: Why WYSIWYG for XML???


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads