RE: Why WYSIWYG for XML???

["Goldstein, Dan" <DGoldstein -at- DeusTech -dot- com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: eric.dunn
> Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 11:16 AM
> To: Goldstein, Dan
> Cc: TECHWR-L
> Subject: RE: Why WYSIWYG for XML???
> 
> And if you are already familiar with using a template and 
> styles, using 
> structure should be transparent to you. In fact you'll 
> embrace it because 
> instead of having to remember which style you use in which 
> circumstance, 
> the choices will be limited to only what is appropriate.

If the style is named after the circumstance ("Caption," "TableBullet,"
etc.), then you won't have to remember which style you use in which
circumstance. This is in addition to the obvious "Style for following
paragraph" option in Word.

> Really, in my experience the most outspoken against the 
> implementation of 
> structure were those that were more concerned with making the 
> text 'look 
> right' and often abused both templates and styles.

All instances of Template and Style Abuse should be reported to "Law and
Order: TSA."

Dan Goldstein

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

SEE THE ALL NEW ROBOHELP X5 IN ACTION: RoboHelp X5 is a giant leap forward
in Help authoring technology, featuring Word 2003 support, Content 
Management, Multi-Author support, PDF and XML support and much more! http://www.macromedia.com/go/techwrldemo 

>From a single set of Word documents, create online Help and printed
documentation with ComponentOne Doc-To-Help 7 Professional, a new yearly
subscription service offering free updates and upgrades, support, and more.
http://www.doctohelp.com

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot-  Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.