Why WYSIWYG for XML??? (take II)

Subject: Why WYSIWYG for XML??? (take II)
From: Geoff Hart <ghart -at- videotron -dot- ca>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 12:06:38 -0400

Eric Dunn observed: <<... if you are already familiar with using a template and styles, using structure should be transparent to you. In fact you'll embrace it because instead of having to remember which style you use in which circumstance, the choices will be limited to only what is appropriate.>>

Excellent point. In my original response, I didn't even consider the possibility that the people seeking WYSIWYG tools might be doing so because they don't know how to use styles properly. And me a card-carrying misanthrope!

--Geoff Hart ghart -at- videotron -dot- ca
(try geoffhart -at- mac -dot- com if you don't get a reply)


SEE THE ALL NEW ROBOHELP X5 IN ACTION: RoboHelp X5 is a giant leap forward
in Help authoring technology, featuring Word 2003 support, Content Management, Multi-Author support, PDF and XML support and much more! http://www.macromedia.com/go/techwrldemo

From a single set of Word documents, create online Help and printed
documentation with ComponentOne Doc-To-Help 7 Professional, a new yearly
subscription service offering free updates and upgrades, support, and more.

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.

RE: Why WYSIWYG for XML???: From: eric . dunn

Previous by Author: Drop term "user's guide"?
Next by Author: Documenting installers?
Previous by Thread: RE: Why WYSIWYG for XML???
Next by Thread: re: Why WYSIWYG for XML???

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads