Re: 'Old fashioned' Tech Writers

Subject: Re: 'Old fashioned' Tech Writers
From: "T.W. Smith" <techwordsmith -at- gmail -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2004 11:11:25 -0400

I don't think so. I've been working the past two days to get an RGB
PDF printed in color from press ... well, offering advice and being
ignored ... but that 40-page Doc file uses only the Normal paragraph
style with overrides. <g>

Personally, I think Word version 2 was the most stable of the lot and
I believe numbering worked back then, too. That release came with a
decently-sized U.G., as well.

On Fri, 9 Jul 2004 10:58:40 -0400,
eric -dot- dunn -at- ca -dot- transport -dot- bombardier -dot- com
<eric -dot- dunn -at- ca -dot- transport -dot- bombardier -dot- com> wrote:

> Really? Explain the blurr, sparkle, and other character formats in MSWord.
> Do a majority of users have any use for many of the new "features" in each
> release?


Remember, this is online. Take everything with a mine of salt and a grin.


ROBOHELP X5: Featuring Word 2003 support, Content Management, Multi-Author
support, PDF and XML support and much more!

WEBWORKS FINALDRAFT: New! Document review system for Word and FrameMaker
authors. Automatic browser-based drafts with unlimited reviewers. Full
online discussions -- no Web server needed!

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

RE: 'Old fashioned' Tech Writers: From: eric . dunn

Previous by Author: Re: 'Old fashioned' Tech Writers
Next by Author: Re: Longhorn - Tech writing changes
Previous by Thread: RE: 'Old fashioned' Tech Writers
Next by Thread: RE: 'Old fashioned' Tech Writers

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads