Re: 'Old fashioned' Tech Writers

Subject: Re: 'Old fashioned' Tech Writers
From: TechComm Dood <techcommdood -at- gmail -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 09:53:46 -0400


> Also, IMHO, my goal (Dood's goal) does not get in the way of doing a
> great job, of being professional, of being the best technical author
> your company could want ... the two go together hand-in-hand.

Right. My family requires my support. This drives my motivation and
ambitiousness (? - sorry, working on finishing my first cup of coffee
this morning) at work. That pays off in my paycheck, which goes back
to my family. I love what I do, and of course I love my family. The
two work hand in hand to ensure I do the best job possible, what's
best for my company, which helps me provide as best possible for my
family.

> I would add to Dood's definition one other thing that is more and more
> important to me, "Job Satisfaction."

No contention there. Job satisfaction plays right into motivation and
ambition. Without job satisfaction, it's very difficult to complete
the circle I described above without there being some "burn" or
"churn" in there somewhere.

> Actually, I think it was talked about and around ... in particular, I
> think we were discussing Microsoft identifying never (or was it
> seldom) used documentation topics and deleting them.

Ah, I think I do recall that now. But, that implies that the info was
written. ;-) Also, there's a difference between documenting everything
and delivering what's being used. I don't recall who posted that
scenario, but by the same token, is there evidence that info that was
omitted due to measured non-use may have been added back in upon user
request?

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

ROBOHELP X5: Featuring Word 2003 support, Content Management, Multi-Author
support, PDF and XML support and much more!
TRY IT TODAY at http://www.macromedia.com/go/techwrl

WEBWORKS FINALDRAFT: New! Document review system for Word and FrameMaker
authors. Automatic browser-based drafts with unlimited reviewers. Full
online discussions -- no Web server needed! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Follow-Ups:

References:
Re: 'Old fashioned' Tech Writers: From: stevefjong
Re: 'Old fashioned' Tech Writers: From: TechComm Dood
Re: 'Old fashioned' Tech Writers: From: T.W. Smith

Previous by Author: Re: 'Old fashioned' Tech Writers
Next by Author: Re: Found out what Docutool is :)
Previous by Thread: Re: 'Old fashioned' Tech Writers
Next by Thread: Re: 'Old fashioned' Tech Writers


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads