Re: Binding methods

Subject: Re: Binding methods
From: Dick Margulis <margulisd -at- comcast -dot- net>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 12:12:24 -0400

David Tinsley wrote:


I am soliciting opinions on different binding methods. We currently use
spiral binding for all our manuals. We are thinking of introducing 3 ring
binding along with tab dividers for our larger manuals. We have produced a
mock up that we think looks quite professional; tabs, nice spine so it can
be read while sat on a shelf; does not collapse on itself when stood on end;
longer lasting; easier updates.

When we presented it to one of our product managers she was not impressed
and told us that it was a step backwards and made us look unprofessional.

I would like to hear other opinions on binding methods.

The spiffiest binding I've seen lately is the CD clamshell. Much sleeker than a jewel case, and ships better, too. Oh, you meant for _paper_!?!?!? Never touch the stuff if I can avoid it.


ROBOHELP X5: Featuring Word 2003 support, Content Management, Multi-Author
support, PDF and XML support and much more!

WEBWORKS FINALDRAFT: New! Document review system for Word and FrameMaker
authors. Automatic browser-based drafts with unlimited reviewers. Full
online discussions -- no Web server needed!
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Binding methods: From: David Tinsley

Previous by Author: Re: STC Transformation -- info
Next by Author: Re: opposite of 'assert' -- 'de-assert' OR 'deassert'?
Previous by Thread: Binding methods
Next by Thread: Re: Binding methods

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads