Re: STC Transformation -- info

Subject: Re: STC Transformation -- info
From: "Gene Kim-Eng" <techwr -at- genek -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 10:03:03 -0700


It's been my experience that there are three basic variations on
"demonstrating value:"

1) The employer or client understands the need for documentation,
either as an asset or a necessary evil, and just needs to see your
value as a documentation professional. This is a basic and essential
element of every position or client, and your goal should be to
demonstrate how you can meet the recognized need and then
improve things beyond that need with other ideas.

2) The employer or client thinks documentation and/or documentation
professionals are unnecessary. This is a lost cause. Give it up and
look for somewhere else to be.

3) There are factions within the employer or client's organization that
take opposing views on the need for documentation and/or
documentation professionals. This is the fertile ground that has
the potential to be cultivated.

I suspect that your feelings about how/whether our profession is valued
depend on which of the above situations has constituted the majority
of your experience.

Gene Kim-Eng



"Bonnie Granat" <bgranat -at- granatedit -dot- com> wrote...

> How many people really feel that the profession is undervalued? All of
> the clients that I have had since a third of my former company was laid
> off in 2001 have come to me because they wanted my services. All of you
> who hold full-time jobs are employed because your employers want your
> services.


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

ROBOHELP X5: Featuring Word 2003 support, Content Management, Multi-Author
support, PDF and XML support and much more!
TRY IT TODAY at http://www.macromedia.com/go/techwrl

WEBWORKS FINALDRAFT: New! Document review system for Word and FrameMaker
authors. Automatic browser-based drafts with unlimited reviewers. Full
online discussions -- no Web server needed! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Follow-Ups:

References:
Re: STC Transformation -- info: From: TechComm Dood
Re: STC Transformation -- info: From: eric . dunn
Re: STC Transformation -- info: From: Fred Sampson

Previous by Author: Re: opposite of 'assert' -- 'de-assert' OR 'deassert'?
Next by Author: Re: STC Transformation -- info
Previous by Thread: Re: STC Transformation -- info
Next by Thread: Re: STC Transformation -- info


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads