RE: ADMIN: An Open Letter to the TECHWR-L Community

["Greg Thompson" <gthompson -at- conformia -dot- com>]

Hi All:

Without taking sides on the whole "STC is cool and useful", "STC is
uncool and useless" debate STC does have a forum called Lone Writers,
similar to TECHWR-L, which I have found to serve a similar purpose as
TECHWR-L has. In fact, I often post questions to both forums and get
responses of equal quality from both. 

In terms of the STC Lone Writers, I don't see any of the evils of STC
that so many TECHWR-Ls insist exist (again, I have no real position one
or another on this debate nor do I particularly care.) People ask
questions. People get answers. It has been that simple for me in terms
of Lone Writers.

If STC (or any other organization or individual) sponsored TECHWR-L the
way Lone Writers is sponsored (or if an organization maintains TECHWR-L
as it currently is), I don't see an issue.

Besides, isn't all we want to do is to ask questions and get answers? :)

Greg


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

ROBOHELP X5: Featuring Word 2003 support, Content Management, Multi-Author
support, PDF and XML support and much more!
TRY IT TODAY at http://www.macromedia.com/go/techwrl

WEBWORKS FINALDRAFT: New! Document review system for Word and FrameMaker
authors. Automatic browser-based drafts with unlimited reviewers. Full
online discussions -- no Web server needed! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot-  Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.