Re: Editors and writers; was: Re: job title nomenclature on biz cards

Subject: Re: Editors and writers; was: Re: job title nomenclature on biz cards
From: "Gene Kim-Eng" <techwr -at- genek -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 17:34:29 -0700


You're absolutely right, of course, but even the best writer (and the
writer in this case was, in fact, one of the best I've ever worked with)
will occaisionally miss something. A second set of eyes is good
insurance, and the more knowledge there is behind those eyes, the
better.

Gene Kim-Eng


----- Original Message -----
From: <written_by -at- juno -dot- com>
> It seems to me that the writer should have proofread the document before
> the editor got a hold of it. Or am I wrong?



^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

ROBOHELP X5: Featuring Word 2003 support, Content Management, Multi-Author
support, PDF and XML support and much more!
TRY IT TODAY at http://www.macromedia.com/go/techwrl

WEBWORKS FINALDRAFT: New! Document review system for Word and FrameMaker
authors. Automatic browser-based drafts with unlimited reviewers. Full
online discussions -- no Web server needed! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



References:
Re: Editors and writers; was: Re: job title nomenclature on biz cards: From: written_by

Previous by Author: Re: job title nomenclature on biz cards
Next by Author: Re: Object Oriented Analysis Is An Oxymoron
Previous by Thread: Re: Editors and writers; was: Re: job title nomenclature on biz cards
Next by Thread: Re: Editors and writers; was: Re: job title nomenclature on biz cards


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads