Re: thanks for feedback on heterodox

Subject: Re: thanks for feedback on heterodox
From: TechComm Dood <techcommdood -at- gmail -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 21:50:03 -0400


> Someone pointed out that in EU and AM it will not
> indicate what I meant it to: I am not looking
> beyond India. Not for the moment.

IMO, if it's on the web, it's gotta be globally oriented. I'm sure
that if you have just a few possible double-entendres on your site, it
will surely be taken lightly (I'd expect a funny e-mail about it by at
least one guy I know). Then again, it *would* possibly boost your page
views...

FWIW, I'd be afraid to open a link to a site named something like
yours from work... just on the off-chance it'd be something
inappropriate to view at work.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

ROBOHELP X5: Featuring Word 2003 support, Content Management, Multi-Author
support, PDF and XML support and much more!
TRY IT TODAY at http://www.macromedia.com/go/techwrl

WEBWORKS FINALDRAFT: New! Document review system for Word and FrameMaker
authors. Automatic browser-based drafts with unlimited reviewers. Full
online discussions -- no Web server needed! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



References:
thanks for feedback on heterodox: From: shankAtIndiaDotcom

Previous by Author: Re: Information architects?
Next by Author: Re: School vs experience... Was: Why so few medical techwriters
Previous by Thread: thanks for feedback on heterodox
Next by Thread: RE: Microsoft pays dear[ly] for insults through ignorance


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads