Re: UK friendly?

Subject: Re: UK friendly?
From: eric -dot- dunn -at- ca -dot- transport -dot- bombardier -dot- com
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 17:15:49 -0400

bounce-techwr-l-106467 -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com wrote on 09/17/2004 12:15:36 PM:
> would actually prefer documentation to
> evolve into tonal arragements that were independent of "languages".

On another note,

What on Earth does that mean? Tones in an arrangement that can be
understood as communication...

Isn't that, by definition, a language?

Eric L. Dunn
Senior Technical Writer


ROBOHELP X5: Featuring Word 2003 support, Content Management, Multi-Author
support, PDF and XML support and much more!

WEBWORKS FINALDRAFT: New! Document review system for Word and FrameMaker
authors. Automatic browser-based drafts with unlimited reviewers. Full
online discussions -- no Web server needed!

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.


Previous by Author: Re: UK friendly?
Next by Author: RE: Allocated chapter numbers for specific chapter content
Previous by Thread: Re: UK friendly?
Next by Thread: Re: UK friendly?

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads