Re: Replacing FrameMaker with

Subject: Re: Replacing FrameMaker with
From: Ian Hawkins <ihawkins -at- sundorne -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2004 13:53:30 -0600

Thanks for the article. Lots of good information.

Would you be able to comment on keyboard shortcuts, especially when applying styles? With FrameMaker, once you know the right buttons to press, applying styles is fast and mouse-free. When I played with OOo, I could not find an equivalent method. The Stylist does not seem to lend itself to efficient keyboard navigation. Correct me if I'm wrong.

And do you have any opinions on OOo vs. Stuctured FM?

Bruce Byfield wrote:

From the cheap controversy department:

My article comparing FrameMaker and has just been published on

Please flame away (but nicely!).


ROBOHELP X5: Featuring Word 2003 support, Content Management, Multi-Author
support, PDF and XML support and much more!

WEBWORKS FINALDRAFT: New! Document review system for Word and FrameMaker
authors. Automatic browser-based drafts with unlimited reviewers. Full
online discussions -- no Web server needed!
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.


Re: Press (printing) Options: From: TechComm Dood
Replacing FrameMaker with From: Bruce Byfield

Previous by Author: disappearing field results in Word
Next by Author: Metatype, metadata and meta stuff
Previous by Thread: Replacing FrameMaker with
Next by Thread: Re: Replacing FrameMaker with

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads