Re: Shorthand...sort of

Subject: Re: Shorthand...sort of
From: "W words" <wongword -at- ozemail -dot- com -dot- au>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2004 04:04:44 +1000

This is not a medical shorthand and searching that wya may not produce the

I have used the with symbol myself since I was at promary school in the
1960s (in Australia). I was introduced to the triangle when I studied
macroeconomics at university, also in the 60s.

I also use three dots shaped in a triangle for "therefore".

There is something similar for "because" that I don't use. I think it is the
triangle with the apex dot on the line and the 2 dots on top.

Irene Wong


ROBOHELP X5: Featuring Word 2003 support, Content Management, Multi-Author
support, PDF and XML support and much more!

WEBWORKS FINALDRAFT: New! Document review system for Word and FrameMaker
authors. Automatic browser-based drafts with unlimited reviewers. Full
online discussions -- no Web server needed!

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Shorthand...sort of: From: Jim Barrow
Re: Shorthand...sort of: From: Barry Campbell

Previous by Author: Tech Comm Survey
Next by Author: Re: Another question to ponder
Previous by Thread: Re: Shorthand...sort of
Next by Thread: RE: Re: Shorthand...sort of

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads