TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
> Interestingly enough the "creatives" (media, publishing, even real
> casual medical companies) all were fine with it. What's odd
> is that the
> one company that said I made a poor judgment call to show it asked me
> "Who was the photographer?" I said "A guy that does construction FT."
> and the man replied, "This must've made his day."
> BUT this is a company that rated me. They gave me 4 out of 5 for
> technical expertise (SQL, Oracle, etc) and a 1.87/5 for personality
> (owing to my "lack of judgment") Where did they get 1.87?
> What kind of
> math is that? There were three male interviewers, one of whom told me
> his sexual orientation on the way to the interviewing room.
> Weird. Weird. Weird.
FWIW (and to be taken with the usual grain of salt) I would
keep the samples, but put it/them behind a text page that
included the above observation.... while mentioning no actual names.
If somebody wants to call you on it, you could just say:
"Hmm? Oh, that was some other evaluating company, I'm sure.
Name? No. That would be telling."
Nobody at the offending company could come back at you
without first admitting: "Well, yeah, we *did* make those
stupid sexist comments to her. That's how we identified
ourselves in her description... oh... wait... can I take
that back? Is that recorder on?"
WEBWORKS FINALDRAFT: New! Document review system for Word and FrameMaker
authors. Automatic browser-based drafts with unlimited reviewers. Full
online discussions -- no Web server needed! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.