TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
The article described a stunning gap in QA. A failure of the gravity
switches would (and did) lead to the total loss of the $264 million capsule.
Was there no way to test their functioning when installed according to the
When I posted this, I had no idea whether there was a writer or assembly
instructions. It did occur to me that (a) if there wasn't a writer, there
should have been, and (b) if there was a writer, part of the writer's job
was to ask, "How do I know that it works the way that I described it? What
happens if it doesn't?"
I have not yet been formally trained in QA, but as a technical writer, part
of my job is to ask those questions.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gene Kim-Eng
> Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 6:05 PM
> To: TECHWR-L
> Subject: Re: TW and QA
> I don't *think* that was the original point of reposting the
> article. I suspect that the idea was that there was not a
> writer or assembly instructions and that such an error
> would not have happened if there had been. I also don't
> think that's a slam-dunk, based on past experience (in
> my case, as the test engineer who used to be responsible
> for verifying that something built to CB's manufacturing
> instructions actually worked). OTOH, the fact that there
> wasn't a role for a TW in such undertakings doesn't
> necessarily mean that there shouldn't have been...
> ----- Original Message -----
> > Lots more good stuff snipped, but you answer my
> > question about whether there was a role for a
> > Technical Writer on such massive one-off projects.
> > The answer appears to be "no".
> > There appears to have BEEN no technical writer to
> > blame for having dared to be non-technical and
> > thereby having screwed up the whole multi-hundred-million
> > dollar project.
WEBWORKS FINALDRAFT: New! Document review system for Word and FrameMaker
authors. Automatic browser-based drafts with unlimited reviewers. Full
online discussions -- no Web server needed! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.