Subject: Re-architecting
From: "Goldstein, Dan" <DGoldstein -at- DeusTech -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 10:40:24 -0400

> -----Original Message-----
> From: jsokohl
> Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 3:02 PM
> Subject: Re: Follow Up Samples
> ...(for inspiration/germination, see

>From one of that site's IA links: "So last weekend I headed over to a fellow
architect's office, and we spent the day re-architecting an IT solutions
Company's site that had over 2000 pieces of content."

Google gives "re-architecting" 10,400 results -- throw in all the various
verb forms and you get to nearly 40,000 results (shudder). I have nothing
against jargon, but does it have to be so darn ugly?


ROBOHELP X5: Featuring Word 2003 support, Content Management, Multi-Author
support, PDF and XML support and much more!

WEBWORKS FINALDRAFT: New! Document review system for Word and FrameMaker
authors. Automatic browser-based drafts with unlimited reviewers. Full
online discussions -- no Web server needed!

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Previous by Author: RE: TW and QA
Next by Author: RE: a different resume red flag
Previous by Thread: Re: Wonky, was: Samples Query
Next by Thread: re: Re-architecting

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads