TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Well, I HAVE looked at the calendar, and I'm forced to agree with this
sentiment. I would definitely not consider myself a prude or a puritan,
but in a WORK situation, one is usually expected to keep to the straight
and narrow, so in dealings with any prospective employer, I would make a
point of sticking rigidly to the straight and narrow unless explicitly
instructed to do otherwise.
> The response of at Firm A was sexism and the response at Firm B was
I'm surprised that I'm the first to offer a dissenting opinion from
those who have been posting on this subject. It makes me wonder if the
posts to date really do reflect the opinion of the vast majority of the
list, or if those who are of a different opinion simply didn't want to
be labeled a prude by responding.
Well, maybe I'll be taking on the title of prude, but I think the kind
of photographs that must have been in that calendar really don't belong
in a portfolio of someone who wants to work for mainstream businesses.
Remember, decisionmakers don't tend to go for the *best* candidate for a
job...they go for the *safest*. They want to hire someone who isn't
going to turn out to be a bad fit, because a bad fit reflects poorly on
the person who decided whom to hire.
If I was going through a technical writer's portfolio and saw the
verbiage that was included in an earlier post...much less seeing the
calendar that it described...it would immediately send up red flags that
this person was as likely to exhibit poor judgment in the workplace as
he or she was in putting together the portfolio.
I participated in the process of interviewing people for a tech writing
position about 5 years ago. One of the candidates, when asked what she
did in her spare time, answered, "I write about SEX" (emphasis hers). I
know *I* wouldn't say such a thing in a job interview, even if I did do
that in my spare time. We ended up hiring her anyway, and she ended up
being as loose a cannon in her work as she was in her interview. She
avoided following any style conventions in the company, and disregarded
all feedback on her work.
I'm not correlating this employee with Michele, as that would be a bit
of a reach, but I *would* compare the appropriateness of the portfolio
selection with the appropriateness of the interview answer.
The information contained in this message and or attachments is intended
only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain
confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission,
dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon,
this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient
is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and
delete the material from any system and destroy any copies.
This email message has been scanned for Viruses and Content and cleared
by NetIQ MailMarshal
WEBWORKS FINALDRAFT: New! Document review system for Word and FrameMaker
authors. Automatic browser-based drafts with unlimited reviewers. Full
online discussions -- no Web server needed! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.