Re: Image Comparison

Subject: Re: Image Comparison
From: eric -dot- dunn -at- ca -dot- transport -dot- bombardier -dot- com
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 09:03:16 -0400

David Neeley <dbneeley -at- gmail -dot- com> wrote on 10/21/2004 07:31:51 PM:
> You have not one but several problems here.

You think. ;)

> First, I would do the binary comparison. If they are the same,
> obviously no further checking is necessary.

We've been working on getting that included in the standard automatic
validation rules.

> There is an open-source Java application made for comparison of
> medical specimen slides which can also work, it appears,
> with .jpg and
> .gif and black and white (and some color) .tiff files:

I'll check that out. Thanks for the link.

Ideally we'd need something that can handle vector formats as well, but

Eric L. Dunn
Senior Technical Writer


ROBOHELP X5: Featuring Word 2003 support, Content Management, Multi-Author
support, PDF and XML support and much more!

WEBWORKS FINALDRAFT: New! Document review system for Word and FrameMaker
authors. Automatic browser-based drafts with unlimited reviewers. Full
online discussions -- no Web server needed!

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Re: Image Comparison: From: David Neeley

Previous by Author: Image Comparison
Next by Author: Re: Trademark Infringement
Previous by Thread: Re: Image Comparison
Next by Thread: Isn't that wonderful

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads