Re: "Type" vs. "Enter"

Subject: Re: "Type" vs. "Enter"
From: TechComm Dood <techcommdood -at- gmail -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 02:26:35 -0400

Agreed. And with regard to "usages are allowed in any specialized or
general writing in English", well, we call them thar thingamabobs
colloquialisms, an' them varmints don't translate well to them other
rootin' tootin languages aroun' th' globe.

MsMoS has is right... "Use the most specific term".

On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 15:35:57 -0400, Bonnie Granat
<bgranat -at- granatedit -dot- com> wrote:
> I think it's the proper reasoning about use of "via." It seems to be an
> argument wholly other than one based on its Latin origins.


ROBOHELP X5: Featuring Word 2003 support, Content Management, Multi-Author
support, PDF and XML support and much more!

WEBWORKS FINALDRAFT: New! Document review system for Word and FrameMaker
authors. Automatic browser-based drafts with unlimited reviewers. Full
online discussions -- no Web server needed!

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.


Re: "Type" vs. "Enter": From: Ned Bedinger

Previous by Author: Re: Display installer panels in doc?
Next by Author: Re: "Type" vs. "Enter" (take II)
Previous by Thread: RE: "Type" vs. "Enter"
Next by Thread: Re: "Type" vs. "Enter"

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads