Re: "Type" vs. "Enter" (take III)

Subject: Re: "Type" vs. "Enter" (take III)
From: "Ned Bedinger" <doc -at- edwordsmith -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 19:04:24 -0700

----- Original Message -----
From: "Geoff Hart" <ghart -at- videotron -dot- ca>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2004 6:09 AM
Subject: "Type" vs. "Enter" (take III)

> There may indeed be a problem with the metaphorical use, which is
> another issue entirely. If comprehension depends on a metaphor, then


I think that most of the latitude taken in modern usage of 'via' is due to
analogy. For example, the streets of Cappadocia and the fiber optic
backbone in the US are analogous in function, so the pre-existing
specialized (geographical) language of the one fits with the other as well,
giving me the freedom to say (correctly):

"I have trunk access via the OC38 Fiber Optic ring around my city."

The unspoken analogy to the streets of Cappadocia is lost on most speakers
of English, so the analogy is not problematic.

But in any case, it doesn't seem likely that other languages are missing the
vocabulary or concepts to translate 'via'. The human activities and concepts
surrounding "mobility" seem pretty darned basic anywhere you can go. That's
where 'via' is at and has always been, hard to believe it is an impediment
for translators. Maybe the issue is that translators are employed who are
not native speakers of English? Still, I don't know why one English
preposition isn't good for translation. Personally, if I had to pick a
preposition I could do without, I think it would be 'of'.

Ned Bedinger
Ed Wordsmith Technical Communications


ROBOHELP X5: Featuring Word 2003 support, Content Management, Multi-Author
support, PDF and XML support and much more!

WEBWORKS FINALDRAFT: New! Document review system for Word and FrameMaker
authors. Automatic browser-based drafts with unlimited reviewers. Full
online discussions -- no Web server needed!

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

"Type" vs. "Enter" (take II): From: Geoff Hart
Re: "Type" vs. "Enter" (take II): From: TechComm Dood
"Type" vs. "Enter" (take III): From: Geoff Hart

Previous by Author: Re: "Type" vs. "Enter"
Next by Author: Re: "Type" vs. "Enter" (take II)
Previous by Thread: "Type" vs. "Enter" (take III)
Next by Thread: Re: "Type" vs. "Enter" (take III)

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads