Re: "Type" vs. "Enter" (take II)

Subject: Re: "Type" vs. "Enter" (take II)
From: TechComm Dood <techcommdood -at- gmail -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 09:21:44 -0400

I truly would love to hear the reasoning behind this ad hoc rule you
threw out there. I have financial and usability data to back up my

On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 16:43:00 -0700, Ned Bedinger <doc -at- edwordsmith -dot- com> wrote:
> *BZZT*
> This is the sort of ad hoc rulemaking that makes the Microsoft styleguide
> such a liability for tech writers.
> The costs and considerations for localizing documentation are emphatically
> NOT a driver everywhere.


ROBOHELP X5: Featuring Word 2003 support, Content Management, Multi-Author
support, PDF and XML support and much more!

WEBWORKS FINALDRAFT: New! Document review system for Word and FrameMaker
authors. Automatic browser-based drafts with unlimited reviewers. Full
online discussions -- no Web server needed!

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.


"Type" vs. "Enter" (take II): From: Geoff Hart
Re: "Type" vs. "Enter" (take II): From: TechComm Dood
Re: "Type" vs. "Enter" (take II): From: Ned Bedinger

Previous by Author: Re: Trademark Infringement
Next by Author: Re: "Type" vs. "Enter" (take III)
Previous by Thread: Re: "Type" vs. "Enter" (take II)
Next by Thread: Re: "Type" vs. "Enter" (take II)

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads