Re: The End Of Technical Writing

Subject: Re: The End Of Technical Writing
From: Martha J Davidson <editrix -at- nemasys -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 17:13:44 -0700

At 05:04 PM 10/28/2004 -0700, Tony Markos wrote:

Arrggg... to a DFDer, hearing a DFD referred to as a
flow chart drives a steak through our heart.

Please tell us the differences, from your point of view,
so that we can learn, not just listen to your dismay.

An example would help. Maybe you could take something
simple and create a DFD and a flow chart of the same process
so we can see how they differ?

Martha Jane {Kolman | Davidson}
Dances With Words
editrix -at- nemasys -dot- com

"Too many words bring about exhaustion."
--Tao Te Ching, chapter 5 (translated by Sheets/Tovey)


ROBOHELP X5: Featuring Word 2003 support, Content Management, Multi-Author
support, PDF and XML support and much more!

WEBWORKS FINALDRAFT: New! Document review system for Word and FrameMaker
authors. Automatic browser-based drafts with unlimited reviewers. Full
online discussions -- no Web server needed!
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.


Re: The End Of Technical Writing: From: Gene Kim-Eng
Re: The End Of Technical Writing: From: Tony Markos

Previous by Author: Re: Tech Comm Survey
Next by Author: Re: Managing help when multiple tools are in one GUI
Previous by Thread: Re: The End Of Technical Writing
Next by Thread: Example of a good DFD

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads