Re: Why not Word?

Subject: Re: Why not Word?
From: Adria Quinones <adriaq -at- earthlink -dot- net>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 08:24:26 -0500 (GMT-05:00)


In our experiences, Word 97 is extrememly unstable on XP, which I'd assumed was 16 vs 32-bit achitecture. I don't care about the functions, but I do care about productivity and data loss.

Thanks, all, for your information and comments.

Adria

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

ROBOHELP X5 - SEE THE ALL NEW ROBOHELP X5 IN ACTION!

RoboHelp X5 is a giant leap forward in Help authoring technology, featuring all new Word 2003 support, Content Management, Multi-Author support, PDF and XML support and much more! View an online demo: http://www.macromedia.com/go/techwrldemo

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Follow-Ups:

Previous by Author: Why not Word97?
Next by Author: Re: simple ui question
Previous by Thread: RE: [OBSOLETE AFC.COM address] XML to MS Word
Next by Thread: RE: Why not Word?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads