Re: new kid on the block

Subject: Re: new kid on the block
From: Bill Swallow <techcommdood -at- gmail -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 10:49:26 -0500

> You also have to wonder why the previous writer was shifted to QA;
> because their documentation was AWFUL, perhaps?

Never assume... it makes an ass out of u and me. ;-)

We can slam people and argue we're right until the day we die and it
won't do a lick of good.

Facts... They're what drive our content and are what need to drive the
purpose and direction we work toward.

If you let anything else get in the way, you're destined for failure.


Accelerate the document lifecycle with full online discussions and unique feedback-management capabilities. Unlimited, efficient reviews for Word
and FrameMaker authors. Live, online demo:

Your Ad Here! Have a product or service you'd like to get some attention for? Use this space to get the word out! Contact lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com for more details.

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

new kid on the block: From: Wright, Lynne

Previous by Author: Re: new kid on the block (long)
Next by Author: Re: Looking for totally subjective opinions on HATs
Previous by Thread: new kid on the block
Next by Thread: new kid on the block (long) Take TWO

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads