RE: "browse to"

Subject: RE: "browse to"
From: "Susan W. Gallagher" <sgallagher5 -at- cox -dot- net>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 18:06:01 -0800

I have settled for "browse to" on occasion. It seems simpler than "display
the following Web site in your browser window" and, after all, you really
don't *go* anywhere -- do you?
-Sue Gallagher

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Milan Davidovic
> Regarding "browse", the MMoS says "To scan Internet
> sites or other files, either for a particular item or
> for general items of interest". If one is looking for
> a particular item, it seems that we could thus say
> "browse [location] for [particular item]".
> However,
> "browse to [particular item]"
> seems to be common (judging from search engine hits).
> If, for whatever reason, the location can be taken as
> understood by the reader, does the latter construction
> sound okay to you in the context of technical documentation?


Accelerate the document lifecycle with full online discussions and unique feedback-management capabilities. Unlimited, efficient reviews for Word
and FrameMaker authors. Live, online demo:

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

"browse to": From: Milan Davidovic

Previous by Author: Re: Re: Fwd: Technical Writing - What's the catch?
Next by Author: Books cheap
Previous by Thread: RE: "browse to"
Next by Thread: Purpose Driven Technical Writing

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads