Re: I have proof

Subject: Re: I have proof
From: eric -dot- dunn -at- ca -dot- transport -dot- bombardier -dot- com
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 10:19:59 -0400


bounce-techwr-l-106467 -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com wrote on 04/14/2005 09:50:55 AM:
> Have you seen the size of that number? WITH my glasses, I could see
> that there was a number, barely, but no way could I read it.

But, considering the size of the device could they have made it any
larger? I agree that the number could have been provided in larger type on
the product box or on a card included in the box. But how much time,
energy, and money would that require to implement and manage?

Perhaps it would be cheaper to provide a magnifying lens? (My favourite
example of this was the bound copy of the Oxford Complete dictionary.
Beautiful minuscule type and packaged in a box that included a lighted
magnifying glass.)

Besides. If you can't read that teeny label on the back how long have you
got left until you can't read the LCD screen on the front or your finger
joints are too stiff to operate the teeny buttons? <lol>

Just really raising the point that when considering design issues that the
solution might not be obvious and there are probably numerous obvious and
less obvious solutions that may or may not force you to compromise other
design, usability, or manufacturing considerations.

Eric L. Dunn
Senior Technical Writer

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

This e-mail communication (and any attachment/s) may contain confidential
or privileged information and is intended only for the individual(s) or
entity named above and to others who have been specifically authorized to
receive it. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read,
copy, use or disclose the contents of this communication to others. Please
notify the sender that you have received this e-mail in error by reply
e-mail, and delete the e-mail subsequently.
Thank you.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


Ce message (ainsi que le(s) fichier/s), transmis par courriel, peut
contenir des renseignements confidentiels ou protégés et est destiné à
l?usage exclusif du destinataire ci-dessus. Toute autre personne est par
les présentes avisée qu?il est strictement interdit de le diffuser, le
distribuer ou le reproduire. Si vous l?avez reçu par inadvertance,
veuillez nous en aviser et détruire ce message.
Merci.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________




^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

WEBWORKS FINALDRAFT - EDIT AND REVIEW, REDEFINED
Accelerate the document lifecycle with full online discussions and unique feedback-management capabilities. Unlimited, efficient reviews for Word
and FrameMaker authors. Live, online demo:
http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



References:
I have proof: From: John Posada

Previous by Author: Re: giving a toss about documentation
Next by Author: Re: I have proof
Previous by Thread: I have proof
Next by Thread: I have proof


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads