RE: "Sheet x of n" for multi-page tables

Subject: RE: "Sheet x of n" for multi-page tables
From: "Chad LaCroix" <chad -at- architext-usa -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 12:44:01 -0400

Donna wrote:

It's not a direct result of anything that happened with our vendors. Just a
dislike for the word "sheet" on my part because the documents can be viewed
electronically rather than just printed (there are no sheets to my screen).
How it might be mistranslated was just another excuse for not using that
word. Sneaky, ain't I?

Happy Friday! :-)


I guess your vendor has escaped the beating ;-)

I agree with you on the use of "sheet" to some degree. But you *can* have
electronic sheets as long as they are clearly defined and seperated (for
instance, MS Excel). But I think that may be rarer than the use of "sheet"
on a less clearly defined and seperated format.

Happier Friday at 5:00!



Accelerate the document lifecycle with full online discussions and unique feedback-management capabilities. Unlimited, efficient reviews for Word
and FrameMaker authors. Live, online demo:

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

RE: "Sheet x of n" for multi-page tables: From: Jones, Donna

Previous by Author: RE: Proof of what? Was I have proof
Next by Author: RE: Proof of what? Was I have proof
Previous by Thread: RE: "Sheet x of n" for multi-page tables
Next by Thread: Is Robohelp Going Away?

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads