RE: Why should I be worried about the merger?

Subject: RE: Why should I be worried about the merger?
From: "Jim Shaeffer" <jims -at- spsi -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 10:51:19 -0400


I'd say that seeing a poorer tool drive out a better tool is one of the
worries, not an assumption. We've seen it happen before.

Jim Shaeffer


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill Swallow
>
> Why are we all assuming that we'd have to settle for a poorer set of
> tools?
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

WEBWORKS FINALDRAFT - EDIT AND REVIEW, REDEFINED
Accelerate the document lifecycle with full online discussions and unique feedback-management capabilities. Unlimited, efficient reviews for Word
and FrameMaker authors. Live, online demo:
http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Follow-Ups:

Previous by Author: Re: watch your language! (or don't)
Next by Author: scope of translation project
Previous by Thread: RE: Why should I be worried about the merger?
Next by Thread: Re: Why should I be worried about the merger?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads