RE: Locating missing graphics-path has to be specified more than once

Subject: RE: Locating missing graphics-path has to be specified more than once
From: "Jones, Donna" <DJones -at- zebra -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 09:37:36 -0500


I missed Emelda's reference to a Unix system in her original message, but what I wrote about the relative paths should still apply. Ignore my reference to Windows Explorer. :-)

Donna

- CONFIDENTIAL-
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential, and may also be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not review, use, copy, or distribute this message. If you receive this email in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply email and then delete this email.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

WEBWORKS FINALDRAFT - EDIT AND REVIEW, REDEFINED
Accelerate the document lifecycle with full online discussions and unique feedback-management capabilities. Unlimited, efficient reviews for Word
and FrameMaker authors. Live, online demo:
http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Previous by Author: RE: Locating missing graphics-path has to be specified more than once
Next by Author: RE: Definition of "user-friendly"?
Previous by Thread: RE: Locating missing graphics-path has to be specified more than once
Next by Thread: RE: Locating missing graphics-path has to be specified more than once


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads