TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
That may be the right answer, but not to my question. I asked if anyone
knew how to *find* the studies that Leah cites -- so I can read them
Your reply suggests that you've read the Hartely & Burnhill, Coe, and
Misanchuk studies. Can you point me to a URL?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Geoff Hart
> Sent: Monday, April 25, 2005 2:13 PM
> To: TECHWR-L
> Cc: Dan Goldstein
> Subject: Citations for ragged (natural) right margin?
> I rarely disagree with Leah, but I have to say that this
> statement is nonsense as written. It's true in the absolute
> sense only if you restrict your discussion to full
> justification without hyphenation, where you can end up with
> horrible rivers, and it's arguably true if the context is (as
> noted in the quoted excerpt) early-90s automated
> justification in Word and other word processors.
> But I defy anyone to produce a well-controlled study in which
> properly typeset justified text is significantly more
> difficult to read than the ragged-right equivalent. All the
> studies I have seen compared apples and oranges, and the
> differences were statistically but not practically
> significant when the justified text was set by someone who
> understood typography.
This message contains confidential information intended only for the use of the addressee(s). If you are not the addressee, or the person responsible for delivering it to the addressee, you are hereby notified that reading, disseminating, distributing, copying, electronic storing or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message by mistake, please notify us, by replying to the sender, and delete the original message immediately thereafter. Thank you.
WEBWORKS FINALDRAFT - EDIT AND REVIEW, REDEFINED
Accelerate the document lifecycle with full online discussions and unique feedback-management capabilities. Unlimited, efficient reviews for Word
and FrameMaker authors. Live, online demo: http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.