issue monikers

Subject: issue monikers
From: Jeffrey Osier-Mixon <jefro -at- jefro -dot- net>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 14:24:31 -0700


Chris Christner wrote:

It seems every senior level tech writer has a pet issue he'd like other
writers to be enthusiastic about. For me it's improving document layout
skills in tech writers--that issue has been fought hammer and tongs for
years until us pro-design types have been given the "font fondler"
moniker.

In that same spirit, we need to find a term for those who tilt at
certification windmills, how about "certifiables"?


Spelling pedants = typochondriacs

TQM lovers = qualitologists

Bosses who deeply scrutinize your writing, replace it with their own, and thereby make the product worse:
micromanglers

any more?



^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

New from Quadralay Corporation: WebWorks ePublisher Pro!
Completely XML-based online publishing. Easily create 14 online formats, including 6 Help systems, in a streamlined project-based workflow. Word version ships in June, FrameMaker version ships in July. Sign up for a live, online demo! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Previous by Author: Re: Help vision?
Next by Author: Re: Help vision
Previous by Thread: Re: Dialog vs Dialog box
Next by Thread: RE: issue monikers


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads