RE: issue monikers

Subject: RE: issue monikers
From: mlist -at- safenet-inc -dot- com
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 08:59:19 -0400


> >those who tilt at
> >certification windmills, how about "certifiables"?
>
>
> Spelling pedants = typochondriacs
>
> TQM lovers = qualitologists

Hmmm Before I got to the end of your last line there, I was
expecting something more along the lines of "proctqualogists".


Kevin (simultaneously ducking and covering his butt)

The information contained in this electronic mail transmission may be privileged and confidential, and therefore, protected from disclosure. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it from your computer without copying or disclosing it.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

New from Quadralay Corporation: WebWorks ePublisher Pro!
Completely XML-based online publishing. Easily create 14 online formats, including 6 Help systems, in a streamlined project-based workflow. Word version ships in June, FrameMaker version ships in July. Sign up for a live, online demo! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Previous by Author: RE: How much to tell users about our wonderful software?
Next by Author: RE: Help vision
Previous by Thread: RE: issue monikers
Next by Thread: In that same spirit, we need to find a term for those who tilt at certification windmills, how about "certifiables"?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads