Re: Dictionaries...are physical ones obsolete?

Subject: Re: Dictionaries...are physical ones obsolete?
From: David Neeley <dbneeley -at- gmail -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 00:08:54 -0500

You can download a two-week trial of Word Menu, which seems more
powerful in many respects than any printed thesaurus can be. Their program is available for Windows and
for the Mac.


On 7/18/05, Bruce Byfield <bbyfield -at- axionet -dot- com> wrote:

> The main reason I continue to use a hard copy thesaurus is that I have
> yet to find an on-line thesaurus organized by concept rather than word
> (admittedly, I haven't tried too hard). I find that a thesaurus
> organized by concept helps me to refine my meaning while a
> word-organized one isn't nearly as useful.


Now Shipping -- WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word! Easily create online
Help. And online anything else. Redesigned interface with a new
project-based workflow. Try it today!

Doc-To-Help 2005 now has RoboHelp Converter and HTML Source: Author
content and configure Help in MS Word or any HTML editor. No
proprietary editor! *August release.

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Re: Dictionaries...are physical ones obsolete?: From: Bruce Byfield

Previous by Author: Re: How to know whether a person clicked a link in an email
Next by Author: Re: TOOLS: Seeking time-tracking software
Previous by Thread: Re: Dictionaries...are physical ones obsolete?
Next by Thread: RE: Dictionaries...are physical ones obsolete?

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads