RE: InDesign not a Frame substitute

Subject: RE: InDesign not a Frame substitute
From: "Joe Malin" <jmalin -at- tuvox -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 10:45:54 -0700

I discovered that InDesign may be useful in tweaking DocBook FO output
for print, according to Bob Stayton of Sagehill Enterprises, who
presented a short seminar last night on DocBook XSLT stylesheets.

Joe Malin
Technical Writer
jmalin -at- tuvox -dot- com
The views expressed in this document are those of the sender, and do not
necessarily reflect those of TuVox, Inc.

-----Original Message-----
From: bounce-techwr-l-216553 -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
[mailto:bounce-techwr-l-216553 -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com] On Behalf Of Mike O.
Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 9:35 AM
Subject: Re: InDesign not a Frame substitute

David Neeley wrote:
> In my view, Adobe dropped the ball long ago by not producing a
> Frame-compatible but more lightweight version that could be sold
> cheaply for engineers and others who need to review documents


Now Shipping -- WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word! Easily create online
Help. And online anything else. Redesigned interface with a new
project-based workflow. Try it today!

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Previous by Author: RE: Reference Books YOU use the most
Next by Author: RE: Why Aren't Open Source Tools Being Considered?
Previous by Thread: RE: InDesign not a Frame substitute
Next by Thread: Re: Adobe Professional glitch driving me crazy

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads