Re: But it would . . .

Subject: Re: But it would . . .
From: arroxaneullman -at- aol -dot- com
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 14:01:20 -0400

It's Friday... and my state is dealing with an emergency.

We'll forgive your error if you'll overlook our typos.


-----Original Message-----
Odile Sullivan-Tarazi <odile -at- palimpsest -dot- com> apoogized:

. . . not "would it would."

Sheesh, speaking of lapses.


Now Shipping -- WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word! Easily create online
Help. And online anything else. Redesigned interface with a new
project-based workflow. Try it today!

Doc-To-Help 2005 converts RoboHelp files with one click. Author with Word or any HTML editor. Visit our site to see a conversion demo movie and learn more.

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.


But it would . . .: From: Odile Sullivan-Tarazi

Previous by Author: Thanks Re: "a SQL sever" vs "an SQL server"
Next by Author: Re: Professionalism on lists
Previous by Thread: But it would . . .
Next by Thread: Re: But it would . . .

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads