Re: Reversal of the outsourcing trend?

Subject: Re: Reversal of the outsourcing trend?
From: "Sarah Davies" <Sarah -dot- Davies -at- macrovision -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 11:13:50 +0100


Bill Swallow wrote:
>I've seen this "trend" occurring for a couple of years now. The
>"trend" is mainly due to a blind move to outsource without fully
>comprehending the costs involved. In some cases it made sense, and in
>others it was more overhead than a savings.

I find this article interesting mainly because I've witnessed the "blind
move to outsource" over the last five years: lose a developer/writer in
the UK or US, hire their replacement somewhere else (usually India or
China). From a writers' point of view it certainly seemed to be more
overhead than saving, judging by the amount of time I spent on
international calls while attached to NetMeeting, trying to talk a
confused writer through the intricacies of structured Frame...

Peter Neilson wrote:
>At the same company some of the products were
>developed and *documented* in England. The resulting
>docs were "professional" from an academic point of
>view. They were thorough and dense, avoided slang,
>and made effective use of the passive voice. Excuse
>me: "They were written to be thorough and dense, they
>were constructed to avoid any hint of nonstandard
>English, and their writing style was carefully chosen
>to make full use of the passive forms of the verb that
>are to be found in the repertoire of any skilled
>writer." They were also unusable.
>Development and documentation were henceforth done
>mostly in the US.

This I also find interesting, because as a UK-based writer who has
worked for several US parent companies, I've had *exactly* the same
issue with documentation written in the US (yes, right down to the full
use of the passive form; "unusable" was generally considered to be an
understatement). It highlights that wherever in the world your
developers or writers are, the development process only has a chance of
being truly effective with clearly defined requirements, communications,
and training. An established style guide also helps...

Sarah

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Now Shipping -- WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word! Easily create online
Help. And online anything else. Redesigned interface with a new
project-based workflow. Try it today! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l

Doc-To-Help 2005 converts RoboHelp files with one click. Author with Word or any HTML editor. Visit our site to see a conversion demo movie and learn more. http://www.componentone.com/TECHWRL/DocToHelp2005

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Previous by Author: RE: Font required to display Hindi characters
Next by Author: RE: Linux for tech pubs
Previous by Thread: Re: Reversal of the outsourcing trend?
Next by Thread: Re: Reversal of the outsourcing trend?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads