BroadVision QuickSilver vs FrameMaker

Subject: BroadVision QuickSilver vs FrameMaker
From: Gérald Bourguignon <gbourguignon -at- allianzmadvac -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 10:24:09 -0400

Does anyone have any experience using BroadVision QuickSilver? I was
specifically wondering how it compares to FrameMaker.

On the BroadVision web site it says "BroadVision QuickSilver enables you to
create and publish lengthy, complex documents in multiple output formats
(including HTML, PDF and Postscript) and automates publishing of
personalized content to BroadVision Portal. Assemble publications from a
variety of text, graphic and database sources, including Microsoft Word,
AutoCad, Microsoft Excel, and Oracle. Includes a complete XML authoring

Here the current requirement is to produce printed manuals and to also have
them available in PDF, and for that I've been using FM. My manager asked me
to take a look at QuickSilver because it's apparently used at another
location to produce manuals.

Thanks in advance.


Now Shipping -- WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word! Easily create online
Help. And online anything else. Redesigned interface with a new
project-based workflow. Try it today!

Doc-To-Help 2005 converts RoboHelp files with one click. Author with Word or any HTML editor. Visit our site to see a conversion demo movie and learn more.

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.


Next by Author: Recent files in Word
Previous by Thread: Re: FM: Master Page title in ToC
Next by Thread: Re: BroadVision QuickSilver vs FrameMaker

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads