Re: Using Wikipedia as an "authoritative" source...
Authoritative, no, but at this stage in my life I consider few
If I have to look something up, I check three reliable sources.
But I find that Wikipedia is very nice for two things:
* public-domain graphics.
* an estimate of the "consenus" opinion on a topic.
Unfortunately, the consensus is not always the view represented in Wikipedia. The problem is fundamental to the model. Anyone with an interest in a topic can write it. And, with many topics, the person most interested is the person with an axe to grind. That isn't always apparent, though, if you are looking something up that you don't already know a bit about.
In many fields (scientific, medical, technical, economic, political, historical, and cultural fields, just to pick a few obvious categories), there are numerous internal debates going on all the time. If someone with an agenda with respect to those debates writes the article, chances are you are going to come away with a one-sided view of current thinking.
Wikipedia is _a_ source, but it's not authoritative by any stretch of the imagination. If you need to understand something accurately (even if superficially), don't rely on it too much.
Try WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word today! Smooth migration of legacy
RoboHelp content into your new Help systems. EContent Magazine Decision-
maker review (October 2005) is here: http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l
Doc-To-Help 2005 converts RoboHelp files with one click. Author with Word or any HTML editor. Visit our site to see a conversion demo movie and learn more. http://www.componentone.com/TECHWRL/DocToHelp2005
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.
- Re: Using Wikipedia as an "authoritative" source..., Bruce Byfield
- Re: Using Wikipedia as an "authoritative" source..., Mitchell Maltenfort
Using Wikipedia as an "authoritative" source...: From: Art Campbell
Re: Using Wikipedia as an "authoritative" source...: From: Mitchell Maltenfort
Previous by Author:
Re: Blogs replace newsletters?
Next by Author: Re: Creating a Style Guide, The Sequel
Previous by Thread: Re: Using Wikipedia as an "authoritative" source...
Next by Thread: Re: Using Wikipedia as an "authoritative" source...
Search our Technical Writing Archives & Magazine