Re: Word to XML

Subject: Re: Word to XML
From: Lou Quillio <public -at- quillio -dot- com>
To: "Shapiro, Deborah [BWIIL]" <dshapiro -at- bwiil -dot- jnj -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 07:41:14 -0500

Shapiro, Deborah [BWIIL] wrote:
> For more info on DITA, take a look at:

These are better:

DITA's more granular than DocBook, though you could easily extend
DocBook to include DITA-like hooks. It's just XML.

Still, DITA looks like it will become an important standard. If so,
it'd be better to go with that standard than to invent your own.


Now Shipping -- WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word! Easily create online
Help. And online anything else. Redesigned interface with a new
project-based workflow. Try it today!

Doc-To-Help 2005 now has RoboHelp Converter and HTML Source: Author
content and configure Help in MS Word or any HTML editor. No
proprietary editor! *August release.

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- infoinfocus -dot- com
or visit

Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

RE: Word to XML: From: Shapiro, Deborah [BWIIL]

Previous by Author: Re: Contract-Style Capitalization
Next by Author: Re: New TECHWR-L Poll Question - TECHWR-L Newsgroup Usage
Previous by Thread: RE: Word to XML
Next by Thread: Bone-headed Question

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads

Sponsored Ads