TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
This message was forwarded anonymously on request. If you want the
original poster to see your response, you must reply to the TECHWR-L
list. All direct replies to this message are automatically discarded.
Contact Lisa lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com with questions.
Hi, all! I've been contracting for several years, but mostly for
small companies. I am now in the process of trying to get a contract
signed with a large company for a new hourly rate project. After many
e-mail discussions regarding minor changes to "my" contract, today I
was presented with "their" boilerplate consulting contract. This
contract has several clauses that conflict directly with the text of
my contract, These clauses are clearly not in my best interest (like
giving up the right to trial by jury in a dispute).
My contact says her company always signs the consultants contract and
has the consultant sign theirs. Is the process of signing "two"
contracts common? (I've never done it.) If I sign them, which contract
takes precedence--perhaps the one signed first, or last??
Thanks in advance for any advice or helpful links. I wish I could
afford a lawyer to review their contract, but right now I cannot.
Now Shipping -- WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word! Easily create online
Help. And online anything else. Redesigned interface with a new
project-based workflow. Try it today! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l