TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:RE: SnagIt and StarDock From:John Posada <jposada01 -at- yahoo -dot- com> To:Melissa Nelson <melmis36 -at- hotmail -dot- com>, daveloveless -at- gmail -dot- com, techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com Date:Wed, 11 Jan 2006 08:27:49 -0800 (PST)
If you want Snagit to function as a vanilla image editor and don't
want it to do anything that an image editor doesn't do, then you are
right...it isn't any better.
However, Snagit does so much more than what an image editor can do.
So, if an image editor falls short of what you need to do, Snagit may
I also never heard of StarDock
--- Melissa Nelson <melmis36 -at- hotmail -dot- com> wrote:
> Never heard of StarDock...but I do use Snag-It
> simply because I like it...not sure that it is
> any "better" than your normal image
> Personal preference I guess.
> >I have a coworker (pseudo-tech writer) who
> >insists that I need SnagIt and StarDock for my
> >screen shots. SnagIt looks useful, but I don't
> >really see any difference beyond your normal
> >image editor. As for StarDock...
Senior Technical Writer
"So long and thanks for all the fish."
Now Shipping -- WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word! Easily create online
Help. And online anything else. Redesigned interface with a new
project-based workflow. Try it today! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l