Re: Starting over (long)

Subject: Re: Starting over (long)
From: "Gene Kim-Eng" <techwr -at- genek -dot- com>
To: "Sankara R" <ss_rajanala -at- yahoo -dot- com>, "John Posada" <jposada01 -at- yahoo -dot- com>, "Michelle Corbin" <corbinm -at- us -dot- ibm -dot- com>, "List,Techwriter" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 23:04:45 -0800

*Ideally,* the tester would be someone who has the same
level of technical literacy as your expected user but little or
no knowledge of the particular product under development.
A "non-technical person" would be fine as a tester for installing the next release of MS Word or a game; for the
installation of a web portal or a distributed computing
protein folding network, I don't think so.

Gene Kim-Eng

----- Original Message ----- From: "Sankara R" <ss_rajanala -at- yahoo -dot- com>

Ideally, a non-technical person, an editor or
peer should do this. Such has been my experience
in the past, in a couple of jobs.


Now Shipping -- WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word! Easily create online
Help. And online anything else. Redesigned interface with a new
project-based workflow. Try it today!

Doc-To-Help includes a one-click RoboHelp project converter. It's that easy. Watch the demo at

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- infoinfocus -dot- com -dot-
To unsubscribe send a blank email to techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.


Re: Starting over (long): From: Sankara R

Previous by Author: Re: Starting over (long)
Next by Author: Re: Incorporating third-party books
Previous by Thread: Re: Starting over (long)
Next by Thread: Re: Starting over (long)

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads