RE: Techwhirlers, re: rude email

Subject: RE: Techwhirlers, re: rude email
From: "Nuckols, Kenneth M" <Kenneth -dot- Nuckols -at- mybrighthouse -dot- com>
To: "Suzette Leeming" <suzette -dot- leeming -at- gmail -dot- com>, "R D" <jaguarjam -at- yahoo -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2006 13:22:51 -0500

Suzette Leeming said what a lot of us thought...

> Now, in my opinion this IS a flame - a personal attack. The thread was
> only in the grey area before.

About six months ago, someone posted a link that is, unfortunately,
appropriate to post again today:

Hope it helps...

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, purge it and do not disseminate or copy it.

WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word features support for every major Help
format plus PDF, HTML and more. Flexible, precise, and efficient content
delivery. Try it today!.

Doc-To-Help includes a one-click RoboHelp project converter. It's that easy. Watch the demo at

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- infoinfocus -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Previous by Author: RE: Formality is going bye-bye?
Next by Author: RE: Style guide and/or templates for Technical Instructions
Previous by Thread: RE: Techwhirlers, re: rude email
Next by Thread: Re: Techwhirlers, re: rude email

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads