RE: Tolerance in text

Subject: RE: Tolerance in text
From: "Jonathan West" <jwest -at- mvps -dot- org>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 16:09:16 -0000

> 25 ± 0.1 means 24.9 to 25.1 is acceptable. From everything I was taught,
> the measuring tool used should be accurate to one more decimal place than
> the tolerance. So, a micrometer that measures in ten thousandths is good
> for measuring any part requiring tolerances in the thousandths. I'd have
> to delve back into other text books for the exact allowances.
> So, in the preceding example 25.11 is too large and 24.89 is too small.

No. In that example, (assuming the measuring device has a measurement
uncertainty of 0.01) the acceptable range of *measured* values is 24.91 to
25.09. Only within that range can you be sure that the measured value
combined with the maximum measurement uncertainty means that the *actual*
value is within the required range of 24.9 to 25.1.

Jonathan West


WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word features support for every major Help
format plus PDF, HTML and more. Flexible, precise, and efficient content
delivery. Try it today!.

Doc-To-Help includes a one-click RoboHelp project converter. It's that easy. Watch the demo at

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- infoinfocus -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.


RE: Tolerance in text: From: eric . dunn

Previous by Author: RE: Tolerance in text
Next by Author: RE: Tolerance in text
Previous by Thread: RE: Tolerance in text
Next by Thread: RE: Tolerance in text

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads