Re: User Interface Design Standards

Subject: Re: User Interface Design Standards
From: "Bill Swallow" <techcommdood -at- gmail -dot- com>
To: "Tony Markos" <ajmarkos -at- yahoo -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 13:58:15 -0500

Agreed where it makes sense to do so.

Walkthroughs and Wizards are quite effective when implemented
correctly, and often involve a lot of "clicking and jumping".

On 2/24/06, Tony Markos <ajmarkos -at- yahoo -dot- com> wrote:
> We should never cram a too much stuff on a page - that
> is obviously bad. Still "skips" and "jump to"s should
> be minimized - that is just common sense.

Bill Swallow
HATT List Owner
WWP-Users List Owner
I support Char James-Tanny for STC Secretary.

WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word features support for every major Help
format plus PDF, HTML and more. Flexible, precise, and efficient content
delivery. Try it today!.

Doc-To-Help includes a one-click RoboHelp project converter. It's that easy. Watch the demo at

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- infoinfocus -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Re: User Interface Design Standards: From: Stuart Burnfield
Re: User Interface Design Standards: From: Tony Markos

Previous by Author: Re: Being Laid Off
Next by Author: Re: Critique of instructions for preparing Pop-tarts
Previous by Thread: Re: User Interface Design Standards
Next by Thread: RE: User Interface Design Standards

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads