RE: That FrameMaker / Word thang...

Subject: RE: That FrameMaker / Word thang...
From: "Johnson, Tom" <TJohnson -at- starcutter -dot- com>
To: "Fred Ridder" <docudoc -at- hotmail -dot- com>, <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 09:54:07 -0500

Hi Fred,

I would guess you are probably correct that Boolean operators would be more efficient. When I set up my files, I would've liked that feature in Frame, but once I got it set up, it works great. I should look into the IF field code for future endeavors.

Thanks for the tip.

Tom Johnson
Technical Writer
tjohnson -at- starcutter -dot- com

-----Original Message-----
From: Fred Ridder [mailto:docudoc -at- hotmail -dot- com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2006 9:07 AM
To: Johnson, Tom; techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Subject: RE: That FrameMaker / Word thang...


As a FrameMaker user and advocate, I feel strange coming to Word's
defense...

In reality, Word's IF field code is more powerful than FrameMaker's
conditional
text implementation because it supports Boolean operators.

In Frame, the show/hide logic is strictly OR, and show takes precedence over
hide. If *any* condition tag applied to a text item is set to show, it
doesn't
matter that every other condition applied to is is set to hide; the text
shows.
In practice, this means that you wind up having to define a larger number of
conditions to cover the logical combinations of orthogonal conditions.
Four products supported on three operating systems means 12 conditions are
required to allow you to have complete control of the show/hide rules.
Boolean operators in show/hide rules is one of the most frequently asked-for
features in FrameMaker.

In Word, you can use AND and OR operators or nested IF fileds when building
the IF feilds to conditionalize text, and this gives much more control over
the
rules that you can construct. On the other hand, the need to specify every
item of conditional content inside these complex field codes is realy
cumbersome.

My opinions only; I don;t speak for Intel.
Fred Ridder
Intel
Parsippany, NJ

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word features support for every major Help
format plus PDF, HTML and more. Flexible, precise, and efficient content
delivery. Try it today!. http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l

Doc-To-Help includes a one-click RoboHelp project converter. It's that easy. Watch the demo at http://www.componentone.com/TECHWRL/DocToHelp2005

---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- infoinfocus -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/archive%40infoinfocus.com

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.


Follow-Ups:

Previous by Author: RE: That FrameMaker / Word thang...
Next by Author: RE: The 6-million-dollar documentation mistake
Previous by Thread: RE: That FrameMaker / Word thang...
Next by Thread: Re: That FrameMaker / Word thang...


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads