TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Annotating HTML - another question From:"Walter Campbell" <atypicaluser -at- gmail -dot- com> To:"Edgar D' Souza" <edgar -dot- b -dot- dsouza -at- gmail -dot- com> Date:Tue, 4 Apr 2006 12:51:25 -0700
Good suggestions. I've used wikis a bit for collaborative authoring but was
thinking more along the lines of Acrobat-style annotations. Wikis and CMSs
seem better suited for collaborative authoring than for document reviews (in
which a single author will make revisions based on feedback from multiple
On 3/30/06, Edgar D' Souza <edgar -dot- b -dot- dsouza -at- gmail -dot- com> wrote:
> This is probably quite different from your mental picture, but:
> How about wikis or CMSs (Content Management Systems) ?
atypicaluser (at) gmail (dot) com
WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word features support for every major Help
format plus PDF, HTML and more. Flexible, precise, and efficient content
delivery. Try it today!. http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l